Fr. 236.00

Comparing Armed Conflicts

English · Hardback

Shipping usually within 3 to 5 weeks

Description

Read more










Comparing armed conflicts primes the production of categories that, when mobilized, can alter the trajectories of the conflicts. Considering the political dynamism of spaces of conflict and intervention, and that practitioners regularly seek out academic expertise, this book discusses the possibilities and limits of comparative approaches to understanding armed conflict and intervention.

Capacity-building experts, development workers, international organizations, and diplomats use their previous experiences and bring them into new contexts to understand and respond to their environment. Conflict actors can also make comparisons to buttress their political position in negotiations, consolidate their control over fighters, and as calls for transnational rebel solidarity. The use of such comparisons is an inherently political move and it has an impact on the production of scientific knowledge, on conflict dynamics themselves, and on the formulation and implementation of conflict management policy: comparison is inherently a practice of order-making. While there are important epistemological and methodological stakes associated with researchers engaging in comparison, there are also important productive effects connected to the research avenues taken.

The chapters in this book were originally published in the Civil Wars.

List of contents

Introduction: Power and Comparative Methods: Performing the Worlds of Armed Conflicts 1. The Importance of Context When Comparing Civil Wars 2. Comparing Conflict-related Sexual Violence: Expertise, Politics and Documentation 3. Fanning the Flames or a Troubling Truth? The Politics of Comparison in the Israel-Palestine Conflict 4. Privileged Sphere of Comparison: Empire, Methods and Conflict Intervention 5. The Middle East is Violence: On the Limits of Comparative Approaches to the Study of Armed Conflict 6. Normative Scaling and Crisis Knowledge: The Problematic Use of Selective Analogies to Compare Conflicts 7. Sahelistan? Military Intervention and Patronage Politics in Afghanistan and Mali

About the author

Bruno Charbonneau is Professor and Director of the Centre for Security and Crisis Governance (CRITIC) at the Royal Military College Saint-Jean, and the Founder and Director of the Centre FrancoPaix in Conflict Resolution of the Raoul-Dandurand Chair, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Canada.
Adam Sandor is Research Associate with the Centre FrancoPaix in Conflict Resolution of the Raoul-Dandurand Chair, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Canada.

Summary

Considering the political dynamism of spaces of conflict and intervention, and that practitioners regularly seek out academic expertise, this book discusses the possibilities and limits of comparative approaches to understanding armed conflict and intervention.

Product details

Authors Bruno Charbonneau, Bruno (Laurentian University Charbonneau
Assisted by Bruno Charbonneau (Editor), Charbonneau Bruno (Editor), Adam Sandor (Editor)
Publisher Taylor & Francis Ltd.
 
Languages English
Product format Hardback
Released 31.07.2021
 
EAN 9781032016375
ISBN 978-1-0-3201637-5
No. of pages 186
Dimensions 160 mm x 240 mm x 16 mm
Series Print on demand
Subjects Non-fiction book > History > Miscellaneous

HISTORY / Military / General, military history, Politics & government, Warfare & defence, Politics and government, Peace studies and conflict resolution, Warfare and defence, Peace studies & conflict resolution

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.