Read more
Informationen zum Autor Rory Misiewicz (PhD, Princeton Theological Seminary) teaches humane letters at Philadelphia Classical School (PA). Klappentext The longstanding debate over how God-talk is intelligible gravitates around how we should understand the putative answer, "by analogy." For some contemporary Christian theologians, analogy involves an ontological claim about creaturely and divine being (i.e., an analogy of being). For others, it involves a semantic or syntactical structure that legitimates the linguistic performances associated with analogy (i.e., a grammatical analogy). Still others appeal to faith in God's self-disclosure in Jesus Christ (i.e., an analogy of faith). Rory Misiewicz argues that all of these approaches fall flat in their explanatory efforts. He draws upon the work of American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce to rethink the relation between God and human beings. He argues that Christian theologians may view that relation as being established by an "analogy of signs": both God and human beings are univocally involved in semiosis, or sign-process, and the confirmation of God's semiotic identity is found in the revelation of God in the person of Jesus, the incarnate Son of God. Therefore, ordinary analogical language is intelligible, for divine signs are commensurate with human signs. Inhaltsverzeichnis Chapter 1 Introduction Part 1 Requirements for a Successful Analogy Chapter 2 How Analogy Works: Intelligibility, Modeling, and Guidelines Part 2 Influential Positions on Theological Analogy and their Inadequacies Chapter 3 Analogia Entis Chapter 4 Grammatical Thomism and Analogy Chapter 5 Analogia Fidei Part 3 The Peircean Alternative for Theological Analogy Chapter 6 Peirce's Philosophy and Intelligibility Chapter 7 Analogia Signorum
