Read more
"There is a growing literature on the perils as well as harm prevention potential of police regulation by recording. As a scholar of information studies, Bryce Newell offers intriguing theoretical and philosophical frames attentive to information politics and informed by fieldwork."—Mary D. Fan, author of Camera Power: Policing, Proof, Privacy, and Audiovisual Big Data
"Significantly advances our understanding of police and society and the politics of information under the deluge of creeping (or perhaps better) galloping new surveillance technologies. Newell’s clear-headed interdisciplinary exploration drops gentle rain on the arid parade of unreflective, optimistic narratives, viewing police-worn cameras and their visual records as salvation. A foundational text for scholars and practitioners."—Gary T. Marx, author of Windows Into the Soul: Surveillance and Society in an Age of High Technology
List of contents
Acknowledgments
Note about Prior Publications
Introduction
1 Visibility, Surveillance, and the Police
2 Privacy, Speech, and Access to Information
3 Bystander Video and "the Right to Record"
4 Policing as (Monitored) Performance
5 The (Techno-)Regulation of Police Work
6 Public Disclosure as "Direct to YouTube" Alternative
Conclusion
Methodological Note
Appendix A. Tables
Appendix B. Figures
Notes
Bibliography
Index
Summary
Police Visibility presents empirically grounded research into how police officers experience and manage the information politics of surveillance and visibility generated by the introduction of body cameras into their daily routines and the increasingly common experience of being recorded by civilian bystanders. Newell elucidates how these activities intersect with privacy, free speech, and access to information law and argues that rather than being emancipatory systems of police oversight, body-worn cameras are an evolution in police image work and state surveillance expansion. Throughout the book, he catalogs how surveillance generates information, the control of which creates and facilitates power and potentially fuels state domination. The antidote, he argues, is robust information law and policy that puts the power to monitor and regulate the police squarely in the hands of citizens.
