Read more
This book provides a critical commentary on Hegel's introductory essay to the first book of his magnum opus, the Science of Logic. Robert Dunphy makes an extended case for the importance of the influence of Pyrrhonian Scepticism on the beginning of Hegel's Logic and provides a novel interpretation of the "problem of beginning".
List of contents
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
Introduction: With What Must the Beginning of the Science be Made?
0.0 Introduction
0.1 Hegel's Logic and its Beginning
0.2 Hegel and Pyrrhonian Scepticism
0.3 A Brief Précis of "With what must the beginning of the science be made?"
0.4 Conclusion
Chapter 1: Hegel and Pyrrhonian Scepticism
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Sextus' Account of Pyrrhonism
1.2 Hegel and Pyrrhonism
1.3 Conclusion
Chapter 2: A Short History of the Problem of Beginning
2.0 Introduction
2.1 The Objective and the Subjective Beginning
2.2 The Methodological Beginning
2.3 The Modern Problem of Beginning
2.4 Hegel on First Principles and the Beginning
2.5 Conclusion
Chapter 3: The Problem of Beginning
3.0 Introduction
3.1 The Problem of Beginning: Preliminary Investigation
3.2 The Problem of Beginning as an Agrippan Problem
3.3 The Solution to the Problem of Beginning
3.4 Alternatives Criticised, Objections Anticipated
3.5 Conclusion
Chapter 4: Mediation I: Phenomenology
4.0 Introduction
4.1 The Phenomenology and the Beginning of the Logic
4.2 Some Problems
4.3 Conclusion
Chapter 5: Mediation II: Completed Scepticism
5.0 Introduction
5.1 A Third Solution?
5.2 Completed Scepticism
5.3 Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
About the author
Robert Dunphy is teaching fellow in Philosophy at the University of Sussex and post-doctoral research fellow at the Maimonides Institute at the University of Hamburg.
Summary
This book provides a critical commentary on Hegel’s introductory essay to the first book of his magnum opus, the Science of Logic. Robert Dunphy makes an extended case for the importance of the influence of Pyrrhonian Scepticism on the beginning of Hegel’s Logic and provides a novel interpretation of the “problem of beginning”.
