Read more
Zusatztext Arenson carefully and systematically sifts through relevant primary and secondary sources to build a plausible argument that the Epicureans tie pleasure (in all its varieties) to proper organic functioning. Anyone interested in Epicurean hedonism as a response to Platonist and early Academic views of pleasure should read this book. Informationen zum Autor Dr Kelly Arenson is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Duquesne University, USA. Vorwort Interprets Epicurean hedonism through Platonic theory, focussing on health, physiology, pleasure, and pain. Zusammenfassung This book links Plato and Epicurus, two of the most prominent ethicists in the history of philosophy, exploring how Platonic material lays the conceptual groundwork for Epicurean hedonism. It argues that, despite their significant philosophical differences, Plato and Epicurus both conceptualise pleasure in terms of the health and harmony of the human body and soul. It turns to two crucial but underexplored sources for understanding Epicurean pleasure: Plato’s treatment of psychological health and pleasure in the Republic , and his physiological account of bodily harmony, pleasure, and pain in the Philebus . Kelly Arenson shows first that, by means of his mildly hedonistic and sometimes overtly anti-hedonist approaches, Plato sets the agenda for future discussions in antiquity of the nature of pleasure and its role in the good life. She then sets Epicurus’ hedonism against the backdrop of Plato’s ontological and ethical assessments of pleasure, revealing a trend in antiquity to understand pleasure and pain in terms of the replenishment and maintenance of an organism’s healthy functioning. Health and Hedonism in Plato and Epicurus will be of interest to anyone interested in the relationship between these two philosophers, ancient philosophy, and ethics. Inhaltsverzeichnis Notes on TextNotes on TranslationAbbreviationsIntroduction1. The Pleasure of Psychic Harmony in the Republic 2. Restorative Pleasure and the Neutral State of Health in the Philebus 3. Plato's Anti-Hedonist Process Argument4. Cicero's De Finibus and Epicurean Pleasure5. Epicurean Pleasures of bodily and mental health6. Pleasurable restorations of health in Epicurean hedonism7. Epicureans on Taste, Sex, and other Non-Restorative Pleasures8. Conclusion: health and hedonism in Plato and EpicurusBibliographyIndex...
