Read more
Zusatztext Shireen Morris has been one of the most passionate and courageous advocates for Indigenous people and their overdue recognition in the Australian Constitution. Anyone who has followed the debate will know of Shireen’s articulate and persuasive advocacy … [she] shows that reconciliation is not just about black and white. It’s the responsibility of all Australians. Informationen zum Autor Shireen Morris is Senior Lecturer at Macquarie Law School, Australia.In May 2017, the First Nations formed a historic national consensus in the Uluru Statement from the Heart, calling for a First Nations voice to be enshrined in the Australian Constitution. This book is a timely and important contribution to the legal and policy debate over indigenous constitutional recognition in Australia, presenting an insightful analysis of the arguments and logic behind the proposal for a First Nations voice in the Constitution. Zusammenfassung This book makes the legal and political case for Indigenous constitutional recognition through a constitutionally guaranteed First Nations voice, as advocated by the historic Uluru Statement from the Heart. It argues that a constitutional amendment to empower Indigenous peoples with a fairer say in laws and policies made about them and their rights, is both constitutionally congruent and politically achievable. A First Nations voice is deeply in keeping with the culture, design and philosophy of Australia’s federal Constitution, as well as the long history of Indigenous advocacy for greater empowerment and self-determination in their affairs. Morris explores the historical, political, theoretical and international contexts underpinning the contemporary debate, before delving into the constitutional detail to craft a compelling case for change. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Introduction I. Background II. Structure of this Book 2. The Historical, Political and Theoretical Context I. The Problem of Purpose II. Historical Context III. Political Context IV. Theoretical Context3. Understanding Objections to a Racial Non-Discrimination Guarantee I. Introduction II. The Expert Panel’s Racial Non-Discrimination Recommendation III. Objections to a Racial Non-Discrimination Clause IV. Responding to the Objections V. Is a Qualified Power the Answer? VI. Conclusion 4. International Inspiration I. UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples II. New Zealand III. Canada IV. Sámi Parliaments: Norway, Sweden and Finland V. Conclusion 5. The Legislative Possibility of Reserved Indigenous Seats in Parliament I. Introduction II. Constitutional Constraints III. How Much Legislative Flexibility Does the Constitution Confer? IV. What Does this Mean for Reserved Indigenous Seats? V. Conclusion 6. The Case for a First Nations Voice in the Constitution I. Introduction II. Re-Capping the Case for Change III. Distinguishing the Inter-State Commission and ATSIC IV. Assessing Options for Constitutional Amendments V. Legislative Mechanisms to Enhance Impact VI. Addressing Political Objections VII. Conclusion 7. Conclusion...