Read more
Party and Nation examines immigration as a means to understand party competition in American history. The rise of Donald Trump reflects an ongoing regime change in the U.S., in which multiculturalism and nationalism have emerged as central aspects of the major parties' ideological and coalitional bases. This phenomenon of a multiculturalist Democratic Party and a nationalist Republican Party, the authors suggest, is a dramatic departure from the first American political regime. That older regime was grounded in the Founding generation's commitment to the principle of natural rights and the shaping of a national culture to support that principle. Partisan debates over immigration set into relief the tensions inherent in that commitment. The authors present the permutations of that first regime amidst the territorial expansion of the country and the tragic conflicts over slavery and segregation. With industrialization, the great immigrant wave at the turn of the 20th century, and the rise of the progressive administrative state, the parties began their century-long transformation into the plebiscitary institutions they are today. This new political reality, it is argued, brought with it a situation in which the debate over immigration not only illuminates party differences, but has begun to define them.
List of contents
1 Nationalism, Republicanism and the First Parties
2 Immigration, Expansion and the Mass Parties
3 Slavery, Labor and the New Immigration
4 Parties, Progress and Closing the Open Door
5 The Rise and Fall of the New Deal
6 Ideological Parties and the Return of Mass Immigration
7 Multiculturalism and Nationalism: Obama and Trump
About the author
Scot J. Zentner is professor of political science at California State University, San Bernardino.
Michael C. LeMay is professor emeritus at California State University, San Bernardino.
Summary
Party and Nation examines party competition in American history through the lens of debates over immigration, an issue central to national identity. The authors argue that today’s divide between nationalism and multiculturalism represents a dramatic change in the very nature of the party regime in the United States.
