Read more
This pamphlet is meant for all adults, though primarily for women: it is a political manifesto for their social status. The author suggests that his sympathizers can, on short term, equalize the social status of all women to that of men; no matter whether all these women associate with the political left or right, with traditional or recent-alternative lifestyles. An obvious rebuttal to this suggestion is that feminism, in its multiple "waves", has already been trying hard to do this during the past half century. My obvious reply is that it not only pitifully failed, but managed to make matters worse due to its retrograde ideology, which focuses exclusively on high-status directive jobs instead of on all jobs. That also men are targeted, is because the realization of a gender-independent social status, if well implemented, implies an enormous boost for a country's economy. A reader might ask: in this case, isn't your conditional ("if well implemented") the hidden warrant of such economic success? No sir: "Good implementation" only refers to respecting the econometric laws of a healthy free market, where "healthy" implies the absence of monopolies and deep-state parasites. The US heavily fails on both accounts. Remember President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110?
About the author
The author spent 20 years of his life as a researcher and university professor in the traditional scientific disciplines: physics, chemistry, mathematics, and biology. He specialized in the behavior of electrons in optically excited nanocrystals in solution. The most famous name in the field of reactive nanoparticles is that of Steven Jones, who reconstructed the nature of the explosives stalled in the twin towers: they were composed of two layers of atomic aluminum nanocrystals and iron oxide nanocrystals, coated on some flexible substrate. Whereas Steven Jones studied the New York dust (remainders of the twin towers) with all possible physical and chemical techniques, the author specialized on a single technique (femtosecond time-resolved optic-pump teraherz-probe spectroscopy) and applied it to non-explosive crystals of different shapes (spheres, cubes, foils), structures (pure, layered, mixed), and chemical composition (like PbS and CdSe). He used mathematics and quantum mechanics to explain his measured results. Intrigued by the sequel of the 1996 Sokal hoax, in 2015 the author decided to change his research, and has since then published four books on historic and sociologic themes (though not in the spirit of Sokal).
