Fr. 140.00

Foucault and Family Relations - Governing From a Distance in Australia

English · Hardback

Shipping usually within 3 to 5 weeks

Description

Read more










Foucault and Family Relations analyzes notions of property in rural Australia during the colonial period and examines how these concepts maintained family stability. Using Foucault's ideas on family, sexuality, race, space, and economics, Voyce outlines how inheritance and divorce law were established so that the state could rule from a distance.

List of contents










Chapter 1: The Social Context of Farming
Chapter 2: The Dispossession of Aboriginals from Land: An Application of Foucault's Theories on Race and Sexuality
Chapter 3: Property and the Governance of the Family Farm
Chapter 4: A Reading of Divorce Judgments and Reflections on "Spatiality" and "Sexuality"
Chapter 5: Governing at a Distance: The Role of Trusts in Structuring Family Life in Rural Australia
Chapter 6: Towards a 'Family Provision Jurisprudence': A Case Study on the Farming Inheritance Cases
Chapter 7: Towards a 'Family Provision Jurisprudence': A Case Study on the Farming Inheritance Cases
Chapter 8: Governing the Rural Family in Australia from a Distance: The Family Provision Act and the Role of 'Expert Knowledges'

About the author










By Malcolm Voyce

Summary

Foucault and Family Relations analyzes notions of property in rural Australia during the colonial period and how these conceptions maintained family stability. Using Foucault’s ideas on family, sexuality, race, space, and economics, Voyce outlines how inheritance and divorce law were established so that the state could rule from a distance.

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.