Read more
This book examines the speculative core of Karl Barth's theology, reconsidering the relationship between theory and practice in Barth's thinking. A consequence of this reconsideration is the recognition that Barth's own account of his theological development is largely correct. Sigurd Baark draws heavily on the philosophical tradition of German Idealism, arguing that an important part of what makes Barth a speculative theologian is the way his thinking is informed by the nexus of self-consciousness, reason and, freedom, which was most fully developed by Kant, Fichte, and Hegel. The book provides a new interpretation of Barth's theology, and shows how a speculative understanding of theology is useful in today's intellectual climate.
List of contents
Chapter 1: Introduction.- Chapter 2: The Speculative Aspect.- Chapter 3: Kant's Critical Philosophy.- Chapter 4: Fichte and Hegel on Knowledge and Self-consciousness.- Chapter 5: The Early Dialectical Theology of Barth and Thurneysen.- Chapter 6: The Form of Barth's Speculative Theology.- Chapter 7: Barth's Speculative Theology and the Kirchliche Dogmatik.- Chapter 8: Conclusion.
About the author
Sigurd Baark is an assistant pastor at the German Reformed Church of Copenhagen, as well as an associate research fellow at the Faculty of Theology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Summary
This book examines the speculative core of Karl Barth’s theology, reconsidering the relationship between theory and practice in Barth’s thinking. A consequence of this reconsideration is the recognition that Barth’s own account of his theological development is largely correct. Sigurd Baark draws heavily on the philosophical tradition of German Idealism, arguing that an important part of what makes Barth a speculative theologian is the way his thinking is informed by the nexus of self-consciousness, reason and, freedom, which was most fully developed by Kant, Fichte, and Hegel. The book provides a new interpretation of Barth’s theology, and shows how a speculative understanding of theology is useful in today’s intellectual climate.
Additional text
“Baark’s argument regarding speculative theology, and in particular the way that it critically departs from McCormack’s work, positions The Affirmations of Reason to be a helpful, if provocative, foundation for future scholarship to build upon. … There is a fascinating interplay of certainty and indubitability of God’s existence and character that is also radically non-totalizing. This certainly deserves further consideration, alongside the primary arguments Baark offers about Barth’s speculative theology.” (Michael Laminack, readingreligion.org, July, 2018)
Report
"Baark's argument regarding speculative theology, and in particular the way that it critically departs from McCormack's work, positions The Affirmations of Reason to be a helpful, if provocative, foundation for future scholarship to build upon. ... There is a fascinating interplay of certainty and indubitability of God's existence and character that is also radically non-totalizing. This certainly deserves further consideration, alongside the primary arguments Baark offers about Barth's speculative theology." (Michael Laminack, readingreligion.org, July, 2018)
