Read more
Volume 180 reports in English on decisions of international courts and arbitrators and judgments of national courts.
List of contents
1. Cudak v. Lithuania; 2. Sabeh El Leil v. France; 3. Wallishauser v. Austria (No 1); 4. Oleynikov v. Russia; 5. Wallishauser v. Austria (No 2); 6. Radunovi¿ and Others v. Montenegro; 7. Naku v. Lithuania and Sweden; 8. Naït-Liman v. Switzerland; 9. Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v. Republic of Nauru and Another; 10. Mohamed X v. Fettouma Z; 11. Pfarr v. Anonymous; 12. A v. Republic of B; 13. Abusabib and another v. Taddese; 14. Harrington v. United States of America; 15. United States of America v. Nolan; 16. Ogelegbanwei and others v. President of Nigeria and others; 17. Reyes v. Al-Malki and another; 18. Benkharbouche v. Embassy of the Republic of Sudan (Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Others Intervening); Janah v. Libya (Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Others Intervening); Benkharbouche v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs; Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Libya v. Janah; 19. Gonzalez Paredes v. Vila and Nielsen; 20. El Hadad v. United Arab Emirates and Embassy; 21. Sabbithi and Others v. Al Saleh and Another; 22. Montuya v. Chedid and Another; 23. Fun v. Pulgar and Albergrin; Consolidated tables of cases volumes 126-180.
About the author
Christopher Greenwood, C.M.G., Q.C. is a Member of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, a Bencher of the Middle Temple and former Judge of the International Court of Justice.Karen Lee is a Fellow of the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge, and Vice-Mistress and Fellow of Girton College, Cambridge.
Summary
Volume 180 is devoted to the UK Supreme Court judgment in Reyes v. Al-Malki and related decisions, the UK Supreme Court and Court of Appeal judgments in Benkharbouche v. Secretary of State, and related decisions and the Grand Chamber judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Naït-Liman v. Switzerland.
