Fr. 54.60

Lacan and Theological Discourse

English · Paperback / Softback

Shipping usually takes at least 4 weeks (title will be specially ordered)

Description

Read more










The authors examine implications of Jacques Lacan's psychoanalytic theory of discourse for the understanding of theological language. Topics include self, desire, post-structuralism, the unconscious, the father's rule, dwelling (in Heidegger's sense), Anselm, ontological argument, alterity, utopia, signifiers/signifieds, God, reason, and text.


About the author










Edith Wyschogrod is Professor of Philosophy at Queens College, City University of New York. She has written Spirits in Ashes: Hegel, Heidegger and Maan-Made Mass Death and Emmanuel Levinas: The Problem of Ethical Metaphysics. David Crownfield is Professor of Religion and Philosophy at the University of Northern Iowa. Carl A. Raschke is Professor of Religion at the University of Denver. He has written New Dimensions in Philosophical Theology, Theological Thinking, and Religion and the Human Image.


Product details

Assisted by David Crownfield (Editor), Carl A Raschke (Editor), Carl A. Raschke (Editor), Edith Wyschogrod (Editor)
Publisher State University of New York Press
 
Languages English
Product format Paperback / Softback
Released 30.08.1989
 
EAN 9780791401118
ISBN 978-0-7914-0111-8
No. of pages 179
Dimensions 152 mm x 229 mm x 25 mm
Weight 281 g
Series Suny Series, Frontiers in Educ
Suny Series, Frontiers in Educ
Suny Philosophy
Subjects Humanities, art, music > Religion/theology > Christianity
Non-fiction book > Psychology, esoterics, spirituality, anthroposophy > Psychology: general, reference works

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.