Read more
This book examines the little understood end-of-art theses of Hegel, Nietzsche, and Danto. The end-of-art claim is often associated with the end of a certain standard of taste or skill. However, at a deeper level, it relates to a transformation in how we philosophically understand our relation to the 'world'. Hegel, Nietzsche, and Danto each strive philosophically to overcome Cartesian dualism, redrawing the traditional lines between mind and matter. Hegel sees the overcoming of the material in the ideal, Nietzsche levels the two worlds into one, and Danto divides the world into representing and non-representing material. These attempts to overcome dualism necessitate notions of the self that differ significantly from traditional accounts; the redrawn boundaries show that art and philosophy grasp essential but different aspects of human existence. Neither perspective, however, fully grasps the duality. The appearance of art's end occurs when one aspect is given priority: for Hegel and Danto, it is the essentialist lens of philosophy, and, in Nietzsche's case, the transformative power of artistic creativity. Thus, the book makes the case that the end-of-art claim is avoided if a theory of art links the internal practice of artistic creation to all of art's historical forms.
List of contents
Chapter One: The End of Art Debate.- Chapter Two: Hegel: The End of Art as Truth Incarnate.- Chapter Three: The Transformative Power of Creativity in Nietzsche's Saving Illusion.- Chapter Four: Danto and the End of Art: Surrendering to Unintelligibility.- Chapter Five: Style of the Future.- Bibliography.- Index
About the author
Stephen Snyder is Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey and a Fulbright Fellow at Tbilisi State University, Georgia. His research interests are in the philosophy of art and social and political philosophy. He is co-editor of New Perspectives on Distributive Justice (2018). Recent essays appear in Michael Walzer:Sphären der Gerechtigkeit. Ein kooperativer Kommentar (2006), Philosophy in the Contemporary World and Countertext.
Summary
This book examines the little understood end-of-art theses of Hegel, Nietzsche, and Danto. The end-of-art claim is often associated with the end of a certain standard of taste or skill. However, at a deeper level, it relates to a transformation in how we philosophically understand our relation to the ‘world’. Hegel, Nietzsche, and Danto each strive philosophically to overcome Cartesian dualism, redrawing the traditional lines between mind and matter. Hegel sees the overcoming of the material in the ideal, Nietzsche levels the two worlds into one, and Danto divides the world into representing and non-representing material. These attempts to overcome dualism necessitate notions of the self that differ significantly from traditional accounts; the redrawn boundaries show that art and philosophy grasp essential but different aspects of human existence. Neither perspective, however, fully grasps the duality. The appearance of art’s end occurs when one aspect is given priority: for Hegel and Danto, it is the essentialist lens of philosophy, and, in Nietzsche’s case, the transformative power of artistic creativity. Thus, the book makes the case that the end-of-art claim is avoided if a theory of art links the internal practice of artistic creation to all of art’s historical forms.
Additional text
“The book under review brings a valuable contribution to the discussion about the end of art, grasping it from an interesting point of view which provides the reader with an original insight into the end-of-art theories of three significant philosophers.” (Šárka Lojdová, Estetika -The Central European Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 56 (2), 2019)
Report
"The book under review brings a valuable contribution to the discussion about the end of art, grasping it from an interesting point of view which provides the reader with an original insight into the end-of-art theories of three significant philosophers." (Sárka Lojdová, Estetika -The Central European Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 56 (2), 2019)
