Fr. 45.90

Judgment and Agency

English · Paperback / Softback

Shipping usually within 1 to 3 weeks (not available at short notice)

Description

Read more










Ernest Sosa extends his distinctive approach to epistemology, intertwining issues concerning the role of the will in judgment and belief with issues of epistemic evaluation. While noting that human knowledge trades on distinctive psychological capacities, Sosa also emphasizes the role of the social in human knowledge.

List of contents










  • Introduction

  • Part I: Virtue Epistemology Extended and Unified

  • 1: The Unity of Action, Perception, and Knowledge

  • 2: Virtue Epistemology: Character versus Competence

  • Part II: A Better Virtue Epistemology

  • 3: Judgment and Agency

  • 4: A Better Virtue Epistemology Further Developed

  • 5: Objections and Replies, with a Methodological Afterthought

  • Part III: Knowledge and Agency

  • 6: Knowledge and Action

  • 7: Intentional Action and Judgment

  • 8: Social Roots of Human Knowledge

  • 9: Epistemic Agency

  • Part IV: Historical Antecedents

  • 10: Pyrrhonian Skepticism and Human Agency

  • 11: Descartes' Pyrrhonian Virtue Epistemology



About the author

Ernest Sosa is Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy at Rutgers University.

Summary

Ernest Sosa extends his distinctive approach to epistemology, intertwining issues concerning the role of the will in judgment and belief with issues of epistemic evaluation. Questions about skepticism and the nature of knowledge are at the forefront. The answers defended are new in their explicit and sustained focus on judgment and epistemic agency. While noting that human knowledge trades on distinctive psychological capacities, Sosa also emphasizes the role of the social in human knowledge. Basic animal knowledge is supplemented by a level of reflective knowledge focused on judgment, and a level of 'knowing full well' that is distinctive of the animal that is rational.

Additional text

[Sosa] has written a book that no serious epistemologist can ignore, and in so doing has provided further evidencethat current discussions in virtue epistemology would not be at the high level of sophistication they currently are if not for his contributions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.