Fr. 76.00

Searching Minds by Scanning Brains - Neuroscience Technology and Constitutional Privacy Protection

English · Hardback

Shipping usually within 2 to 3 weeks (title will be printed to order)

Description

Read more

This book examines the ethical and legal challenges presented by modern techniques of memory retrieval, especially within the context of potential use by the US government in courts of law. Specifically, Marc Blitz discusses the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause. He also argues that we should pay close attention to another constitutional provision that individuals generally don't think of as protecting their privacy: The First Amendment's freedom of speech. First Amendment values also protect our freedom of thought, and this-not simply our privacy-is what is at stake if government engaged in excessive monitoring of our minds.

List of contents

1. Introduction.- 2. Constitutional Puzzles (and (Neuro)technological Changes.- 3. Lie Detection, Mind Reading, and Brain Reading.- 4. The Fifth Amendment: Self-Incrimination and the Brain.- 5. The Fourth (and First) Amendment.- 6. Conclusion.

About the author

Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA, and series editor of Palgrave Studies in Law, Neuroscience, and Human Behavior.

Summary

This book examines the ethical and legal challenges presented by modern techniques of memory retrieval, especially within the context of potential use by the US government in courts of law. Specifically, Marc Blitz discusses the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause. He also argues that we should pay close attention to another constitutional provision that individuals generally don’t think of as protecting their privacy: The First Amendment’s freedom of speech. First Amendment values also protect our freedom of thought, and this—not simply our privacy—is what is at stake if government engaged in excessive monitoring of our minds. 

Additional text

“Searching Minds by Scanning Brains presents in-depth discussions of how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments have been used to make decisions about the constitutionality of brain scanning offered as evidence in criminal cases. … This book could be a very helpful text for law students, not only because of the resources and format of the book but also because of Blitz’s modeling of the disciplined logical and balanced thinking of an expert legal scholar.” (Patricia E. Freed, PsycCRITIQUES, Vol. 62 (32), August, 2017)

Report

"Searching Minds by Scanning Brains presents in-depth discussions of how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments have been used to make decisions about the constitutionality of brain scanning offered as evidence in criminal cases. ... This book could be a very helpful text for law students, not only because of the resources and format of the book but also because of Blitz's modeling of the disciplined logical and balanced thinking of an expert legal scholar." (Patricia E. Freed, PsycCRITIQUES, Vol. 62 (32), August, 2017)

Product details

Authors Marc Jonathan Blitz
Publisher Springer, Berlin
 
Languages English
Product format Hardback
Released 01.01.2017
 
EAN 9783319500034
ISBN 978-3-31-950003-4
No. of pages 144
Dimensions 153 mm x 15 mm x 213 mm
Weight 304 g
Illustrations VI, 144 p.
Series Palgrave Studies in Law, Neuroscience, and Human Behavior
Palgrave Studies in Law, Neuroscience, and Human Behavior
Subjects Humanities, art, music > Psychology
Non-fiction book > Psychology, esoterics, spirituality, anthroposophy > Psychology: general, reference works

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.