Read more
Zusatztext 'Jeffrey Lipshaw combines acute legal and philosophical analysis with prodigious legal experience to explain to us both how lawyers do think and how they should think. He makes clear why lawyering needs a fundamental transformation! and starts us down the path to achieving it. Anyone perplexed or angered by the role of lawyers and lawyering in modern society should read this book.'Professor Barry Schwartz! author of "Why We Work" and co-author of "Practical Wisdom".'Jeffrey Lipshaw draws on long experience! first in corporate legal practice! then in teaching! to offer a unique and invaluable guide to legal reasoning: its use in practice and! more importantly! its limits. I would advise all law students who are considering a career in transactional law to read it right away.'Professor Brian Bix! University of Minnesota! USA.'Professor Jeffrey Lipshaw! who practiced law for more than 26 years! has written a great and timely book-calling to mind Karl Llewellyn's efforts to champion "the grand tradition" of law as against "the formal style." Lipshaw leads the reader to recognize that if lawyering is to have any real value! it must shed its narrow self-image as weaponized reason! and achieve self-awareness to understand its language within broader moral! social! and philosophical contexts. It must in short understand itself as not merely a technical profession! but a liberal arts vocation.This is a distinctive and learned book with a breezy earnest style all its own. Law students should read this after the 1L year! lawyers and academics at any time! and judges right away.'University Distinguished Professor Pierre Schlag! University of Colorado! USA Informationen zum Autor Jeffrey Lipshaw is a professor at Suffolk University Law School and former company general counsel. He writes on contract theory, business judgment, and legal education, and jurisprudence. His most recent publication uses business law to reassess the influence of Kant’s epistemology on Hans Kelsen. Zusammenfassung This book offers an explanation both of what it means to do the job of pure lawyering well, and an avenue for getting beyond (or unlearning) merely how to think like a lawyer. It combines legal theory, philosophy of knowledge, and doctrine with an appreciation of real-life judgment calls that multi-disciplinary lawyers are called upon to make. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1.Why a Critique? 2. The Logic of Pure Lawyering 3. Assessing Theory-Making in Pure Lawyering 4. Games and Models 5. Causation and Blame 6. Action, Authority, Rationalization, and Judgment 7. Beyond Legal Reasoning ...
