Fr. 69.00

Foucault, Douglass, Fanon, and Scotus in Dialogue - On Social Construction and Freedom

English · Paperback / Softback

Shipping usually within 1 to 2 weeks (title will be printed to order)

Description

Read more

Zusatztext "Nielsen's work is well written, thought provoking, and an asset to the field. I highly recommend this read for those interested in interdisciplinary studies of four dynamic philosophical thinkers. Nielsen's subtle yet bold analysis manages to make four unlikely conversations and partners likely. Unlikely, because these four men's life experiences range within different historical time periods: from the medieval to the nineteenth to the twentieth century. Nielsen places these men in the same time and space, offering us vibrant and lifegiving ways of seeing: we see within a multitude of converging and dissenting forms of thought a 'fusion of horizons' opening us to possibilities for envisioning healthy dialogue and reflection. In some cases, we also begin to see these four men and what they stood for in ways not previously recognized. For me, Nielsen's analysis of Douglass and Fanon strengthened and humanized Foucault, and made Scotus relevant in the twenty-first century." - Dr. Renee K. Harrison's, Assistant Professor, African American and US Religious History, Howard University, Black Theology 12.2 "Nielsen's synthetic work in Foucault, Douglass, Fanon, and Scotus in Dialogue is of great value as an example of how philosophers can construct liberating and emancipatory theories by harmonizing the ideas of the many great thinkers within the philosophical canon. Too often we find ourselves mired in combative work, hunting for the weaknesses in the arguments of ourphilosophical adversaries. Nielsen's approach reminds us that ideas can be blended into beautiful configurations, in the same way that blending colors on a painter's palette can yield all of the hues required to reflect the way we see the world." - Joshua B. Cutts, doctoral student of philosophy, Temple University, USA, Foucault Studies, No. 19 Informationen zum Autor Cynthia R. Nielsen is a Catherine of Siena Fellow in the Ethics Program at Villanova University, USA Klappentext Nielsen offers a dialogue with Foucault, Frederick Douglass, Frantz Fanon and the Augustinian-Franciscan tradition, investigating the relation between social construction and freedom and proposing an historically friendly, ethically sensitive, and religico-philosophical model for human being and existence in a shared pluralistic world. Zusammenfassung Nielsen offers a dialogue with Foucault! Frederick Douglass! Frantz Fanon and the Augustinian-Franciscan tradition! investigating the relation between social construction and freedom and proposing an historically friendly! ethically sensitive! and religico-philosophical model for human being and existence in a shared pluralistic world. Inhaltsverzeichnis Introduction Chapter 1: Themes and Their Variations: Harmonizing Humans as Socially Constructed and Free? Chapter 2: Foucault and Subjectivities Chapter 3: Frederick Douglass on Power Relations and Resistance 'From Below' Chapter 4: Fanon on Decolonizing Colonized Subjectivities and the Quest for an Historically-Attuned Symphonic Humanism Chapter 5: Duns Scotus and Multidimensional Freedom Chapter 6: Recapitulation: Humans as Socially Constructed and Free, An Ongoing Improvisation Bibliography...

List of contents

Introduction Chapter 1: Themes and Their Variations: Harmonizing Humans as Socially Constructed and Free? Chapter 2: Foucault and Subjectivities Chapter 3: Frederick Douglass on Power Relations and Resistance 'From Below' Chapter 4: Fanon on Decolonizing Colonized Subjectivities and the Quest for an Historically-Attuned Symphonic Humanism Chapter 5: Duns Scotus and Multidimensional Freedom Chapter 6: Recapitulation: Humans as Socially Constructed and Free, An Ongoing Improvisation Bibliography

Report

"Nielsen's work is well written, thought provoking, and an asset to the field. I highly recommend this read for those interested in interdisciplinary studies of four dynamic philosophical thinkers. Nielsen's subtle yet bold analysis manages to make four unlikely conversations and partners likely. Unlikely, because these four men's life experiences range within different historical time periods: from the medieval to the nineteenth to the twentieth century. Nielsen places these men in the same time and space, offering us vibrant and lifegiving ways of seeing: we see within a multitude of converging and dissenting forms of thought a 'fusion of horizons' opening us to possibilities for envisioning healthy dialogue and reflection. In some cases, we also begin to see these four men and what they stood for in ways not previously recognized. For me, Nielsen's analysis of Douglass and Fanon strengthened and humanized Foucault, and made Scotus relevant in the twenty-first century." - Dr. Renee K. Harrison's, Assistant Professor, African American and US Religious History, Howard University, Black Theology 12.2
"Nielsen's synthetic work in Foucault, Douglass, Fanon, and Scotus in Dialogue is of great value as an example of how philosophers can construct liberating and emancipatory theories by harmonizing the ideas of the many great thinkers within the philosophical canon. Too often we find ourselves mired in combative work, hunting for the weaknesses in the arguments of ourphilosophical adversaries. Nielsen's approach reminds us that ideas can be blended into beautiful configurations, in the same way that blending colors on a painter's palette can yield all of the hues required to reflect the way we see the world." - Joshua B. Cutts, doctoral student of philosophy, Temple University, USA, Foucault Studies, No. 19

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.