Read more
This book is about mapping the future of eighteenth-century women's writing and feminist literary history, in an academic culture that is not shy of declaring their obsolescence. It asks: what can or should unite us as scholars devoted to the recovery and study of women's literary history in an era of big data, on the one hand, and ever more narrowly defined specialization, on the other? Leading scholars from the UK and US answer this question in thought-provoking, cross-disciplinary and often polemical essays. Contributors attend to the achievements of eighteenth-century women writers and the scholars who have devoted their lives to them, and map new directions for the advancement of research in the area. They collectively argue that eighteenth-century women's literary history has a future, and that feminism was, and always should be, at its heart.
Featuring a Preface by Isobel Grundy, and a Postscript by Cora Kaplan.
List of contents
Introduction: Feminisms, Fictions, Futures: Women's Writing 1660-1830; Jennie Batchelor and Gillian Dow.- 1. Passing Judgement: The Place of the Aesthetic in Feminist Literary History; Ros Ballaster.- 2. Free Market Feminism? The Political Economy of Women's Writing; E.J. Clery.- 3. Feminist Literary History: How Do We Know We've Won?; Katherine Binhammer.- 4. Anon, Pseud and 'By a Lady': The Spectre of Anonymity in Women's Literary History; Jennie Batchelor.- 5. Authorial Performances: Actress, Author, Critic; Elaine McGirr.- 6. Pay, Professionalization and Probable Dominance? Women Writers and the Children's Book Trade; M.O. Grenby.- 7. 'There Are Numbers of Very Choice Books': Book Ownership and the Circulation of Women's Texts, 1680-98; Marie-Louise Coolahan and Mark Empey.- 8. Gender and the Material Turn; Chloe Wigston Smith.- 9. Archipelagic Literary History: Eighteenth-Century Poetryfrom Ireland, Scotland and Wales; Sarah Prescott.- 10. The 'Biographical Impulse' and Pan-European Women's Writing; Gillian Dow.- Postscript; Cora Kaplan.- Notes.- Bibliography.- Index.-
About the author
Jennie Batchelor is Reader in Eighteenth-Century Studies at the University of Kent, UK. Her latest book, Women’s Work, was issued in paperback in 2014. With Cora Kaplan, she is Co-Series Editor of Palgrave’s History of British Women’s Writing (2010-). She is currently working on the first women’s magazines.
Gillian Dow is Associate Professor in English at the University of Southampton, UK, and Executive Director of Chawton House Library. She is the editor of several collections focusing on women writers, most recently, with Clare Hanson, Uses of Austen: Jane’s Afterlives (Palgrave, 2012). Her monograph in progress focuses on Romantic-Period translation and the novel.
Summary
This book is about mapping the future of eighteenth-century women’s writing and feminist literary history, in an academic culture that is not shy of declaring their obsolescence. It asks: what can or should unite us as scholars devoted to the recovery and study of women’s literary history in an era of big data, on the one hand, and ever more narrowly defined specialization, on the other? Leading scholars from the UK and US answer this question in thought-provoking, cross-disciplinary and often polemical essays. Contributors attend to the achievements of eighteenth-century women writers and the scholars who have devoted their lives to them, and map new directions for the advancement of research in the area. They collectively argue that eighteenth-century women’s literary history has a future, and that feminism was, and always should be, at its heart.
Featuring a Preface by Isobel Grundy, and a Postscript by Cora Kaplan.
Additional text
“This is a brave and challenging Book. …we need to engage seriously with aesthetics and dare to make judgments, Most provocatively, she asks us to theorize and develop new methodologies appropriate to the very category of ‘woman writer.’” (Paula R. Backscheider, Early Modern Women Journal, Vol. 13 (2), 2019)
Report
"This is a brave and challenging Book. ...we need to engage seriously with aesthetics and dare to make judgments, Most provocatively, she asks us to theorize and develop new methodologies appropriate to the very category of 'woman writer.'" (Paula R. Backscheider, Early Modern Women Journal, Vol. 13 (2), 2019)
