Read more
Informationen zum Autor Richard Revesz is one of the nation's leading voices in the fields of environmental and regulatory law and policy. He is Lawrence King Professor of Law and dean emeritus at New York University School of Law, where he directs the Institute for Policy Integrity. He is also director of the American Law Institute and a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. A native of Argentina, Revesz has authored eight books and more than 60 articles on law and public policy issues.Jack Lienke is an attorney with the Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, where his work focuses on climate change policy and other forms of environmental regulation. He was previously a litigation associate at Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP in Manhattan, and a law clerk to the Honorable Janet C. Hall of the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. Klappentext Since the beginning of the Obama Administration, conservative politicians have railed against the President's "War on Coal." As evidence of this supposed siege, they point to a series of rules issued by the Environmental Protection Agency that aim to slash air pollution from the nation's power sector . Because coal produces far more pollution than any other major energy source, these rules are expected to further reduce its already shrinking share of the electricity market in favor of cleaner options like natural gas and solar power. But the EPA's policies are hardly the "unprecedented regulatory assault " that opponents make them out to be. Instead, they are merely the latest chapter in a multi-decade struggle to overcome a tragic flaw in our nation's most important environmental law.In 1970, Congress passed the Clean Air Act, which had the remarkably ambitious goal of eliminating essentially all air pollution that posed a threat to public health or welfare. But there was a problem: for some of the most common pollutants, Congress empowered the EPA to set emission limits only for newly constructed industrial facilities, most notably power plants. Existing plants, by contrast, would be largely exempt from direct federal regulation-a regulatory practice known as "grandfathering." What lawmakers didn't anticipate was that imposing costly requirements on new plants while giving existing ones a pass would simply encourage those old plants to stay in business much longer than originally planned. Since 1970, the core problems of U.S. environmental policy have flowed inexorably from the smokestacks of these coal-fired clunkers, which continue to pollute at far higher rates than their younger peers.In Struggling for Air, Richard L. Revesz and Jack Lienke chronicle the political compromises that gave rise to grandfathering, its deadly consequences, and the repeated attempts-by presidential administrations of both parties-to make things right. Zusammenfassung Struggling for Air offers the most comprehensive analysis to date of the Obama administration policies that have become known as the "war on coal." Unconventionally, the authors trace the origins of this "war" to a fateful decision made by Congress almost half a century ago, when it passed the Clean Air Act of 1970. Inhaltsverzeichnis Preface: Conflict and Context I. Coal: A Primer II. War Stories Rise of the Rhetoric Peeling Back the Propaganda III. Congress Misses the Mark Fly in the Ointment Explaining the Error What the Transcripts Tell Us Unexpected Deals, Unexpected Devils Missing the Mark IV. Misadventures in Modification Altered States Spared Change What Goes Up . . . Might Not Count Old Plants, New Tricks A Fishy "Fix" A New Sheriff in Town A Safer Harbor Considering the Alternatives V. Bad Neighbors Tall Orders, Taller Stacks There Goes the Neighborhood Who Will Stop the Rain? To Market, To Market The Sincerest Form of Flattery
