Fr. 58.70

The Sense of Appropriateness - Application Discourses in Morality and Law

English · Paperback / Softback

Shipping usually takes at least 4 weeks (title will be specially ordered)

Description

Read more










Günther's book demonstrates that most objections to moral and legal principles are directed not against the validity of principles but against the manner of their application. If one distinguishes between the justification of a principle and its appropriate application, then the claim that the application of the principle in each individual case follows automatically from its universal justification proves to be a misunderstanding. Günther develops this distinction with the help of Habermas's discourse theory of morality. He then employs it to extend Kohlberg's theory of moral development and to defend this against Gilligan's critique. In the third and fourth parts of the book, Günther shows-in debate with Hare, Dworkin, and others-how argumentation on the appropriate application of norms and principles in morality and law is possible.


About the author










Klaus Günther is Professor of Law at the University of Frankfurt.


Product details

Authors Klaus Gunther, Klaus Günther
Assisted by John Farrell (Translation)
Publisher State University of New York Press
 
Languages English
Product format Paperback / Softback
Released 28.09.1993
 
EAN 9780791415528
ISBN 978-0-7914-1552-8
No. of pages 353
Dimensions 149 mm x 227 mm x 20 mm
Weight 517 g
Series Suny Series in Social and Poli
Suny Social and Political Thou
Subjects Humanities, art, music > Philosophy
Non-fiction book > Philosophy, religion > Philosophy: general, reference works

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.