Read more
This first comparative study of the Symbolist use of myth in France, Germany, and Russia closely examines a selected range of poetic and pictorial works created between c. 1860 and 1910. The focus of the discussion is on a constellation of five artists, linked by a complex network of influences: Gustave Moreau, José-Maria de Heredia, and Jean Moréas (France); Stefan George (Germany); and Valerii Bryusov (Russia). By analysing myth in painting and poetry, the book gives a new insight into the significance of heroic and aesthetic ideals in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century European culture. International and interdisciplinary in its comparative approach, the study reassesses the distinction between Symbolism and Decadence by shedding new light on the role of myth within the paradoxical interaction of classical and modernist values in Symbolist art. In the course of the argument, Symbolist mythological art emerges as a significant link between the cultural heritage of classical Greece and the creative agonies of twentieth-century European society. The book will appeal not only to scholars of literature and art, but also to a wider academic public concerned with cross-cultural transaction in Europe.
List of contents
Contents: The pioneering use of myth in the painting of Gustave Moreau - Moreau's inspirational role for Heredia and Moréas - Moreau and Les Trophées by Heredia - Moreau and the Symbolist verse of Moréas - Myth in Stefan George's verse before 1901 in the light of Heredia, Moréas, and Symbolist painting - Myth in Valerii Bryusov's verse (1895-1909) in the light of Heredia, Moréas, and Moreau.
About the author
The Author: Natasha Grigorian is a Research Fellow in Comparative Literature at Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge. She read Modern Languages (French and German) at Magdalen College, Oxford, where she also completed her doctoral thesis in 2006. She is the author of a series of articles and conference papers on late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century European literature and visual art.
Report
«[A] superb comparative investigation (...) clear and enlivening (...).» (Rachel Polonsky, Journal of European Studies)
