Read more
Zusatztext This is an ambitious project on a number of levels...There is much value in Louden's book Informationen zum Autor Robert B. Louden is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern Maine. He is the author of Kant's Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings (OUP, 2000) and Morality and Moral Theory: A Reappraisal and Reaffirmation (OUP, 1992), co-editor and translator of Kant, Anthropology, History, and Education (CUP, 2007) and Kant, Lectures on Anthropology (CUP, 2008), translator of Kant's Anthropologyfrom a Pragmatic Point of View(CUP, 2006), editor of Schleiermacher's Lectures on Philosophical Ethics (CUP, 2002), and co-editor of The Greeks and Us (University of Chicago Press, 1996). Klappentext The World We Want compares the future world that Enlightenment intellectuals had hoped for with our world at present. How and why are the two worlds so different? To what extent is (and isnt) our world the world they wanted, and to what extent do we today still want their world? How large is the gap between Enlightenment ideals and present reality, and why is it so large? Louden explores these questions and advances an argument that the widespreadEnlightenment assumption that external institutional changes lead to internal attitudinal changes is not well supported by historical experience-and that many of the ideals advocated by the Enlightenment do not fit with human nature. Zusammenfassung The World We Want compares the future world that Enlightenment intellectuals had hoped for with our own world at present. In what respects do the two worlds differ! and why are they so different? To what extent is and isn't our world the world they wanted! and to what extent do we today still want their world? Unlike previous philosophical critiques and defenses of the Enlightenment! the present study focuses extensively on the relevant historical andempirical record first! by examining carefully what kind of future Enlightenment intellectuals actually hoped for; second! by tracking the different legacies of their central ideals over the past two centuries.But in addition to documenting the significant gap that still exists between Enlightenment ideals and current realities! the author also attempts to show why the ideals of the Enlightenment still elude us. What does our own experience tell us about the appropriateness of these ideals? Which Enlightenment ideals do not fit with human nature? Why is meaningful support for these ideals! particularly within the US! so weak at present? Which of the means that Enlightenment intellectuals advocatedfor realizing their ideals are inefficacious? Which of their ideals have devolved into distorted versions of themselves when attempts have been made to realize them? How and why! after more than two centuries! have we still failed to realize the most significant Enlightenment ideals? In short! what isdead and what is living in these ideals? ...
