Read more
Informationen zum Autor Paul H. Robinson is Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law and most recently the author of Distributive Principles of Criminal Law (OUP, 2008).Stephen Garvey is Professor of Law at Cornell University School of Law.Kimberly Kessler Ferzan is Professor of Law at Rutgers University School of Law, Camden. Klappentext Criminal Law Conversations provides an authoritative overview of contemporary criminal law debates in the United States. This collection of high caliber scholarly papers was assembled using an innovative and interactive method of nominations and commentary by the nation's top legal scholars. Virtually every leading scholar in the field has participated, resulting in a volume of interest to those both in andoutside of the community. Criminal Law Conversations showcases the most captivating of these essays, and provides insight into the most fundamental and provocative questions of modern criminal law. Zusammenfassung Criminal Law Conversations provides an authoritative overview of contemporary criminal law debates in the United States. This collection of high caliber scholarly papers was assembled using an innovative and interactive method of nominations and commentary by the nation's top legal scholars. Virtually every leading scholar in the field has participated, resulting in a volume of interest to those both in and outside of the community. Criminal Law Conversations showcases the most captivating of these essays, and provides insight into the most fundamental and provocative questions of modern criminal law. Inhaltsverzeichnis i. Principles Chapter 1. Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law Meir Dan-Cohen Comments: Kyron Huigens-Duress Is Never a Conduct Rule Samuel W. Buell-Decision Rule as Notice: The Case of Fraud Anne M. Coughlin-Of Decision Rules and Conduct Rules, or Doing the Police in Different Voices Luís Duarte d'Almeida-Separation, But Not of Rules Adil Ahmad Haque-The Constitutive Function of Criminal Law Eric J. Miller-Are There Two Types of Decision Rule? Malcolm Thorburn-A Liberal Criminal Law Cannot Be Reduced to These Two Types of Rules Reply: Meir Dan-Cohen Chapter 2. Empirical Desert Paul H. Robinson Comments: Mary Sigler-The False Promise of Empirical Desert Adam J. Kolber-Compliance-Promoting Intuitions Michael T. Cahill-A Fertile Desert? Alice Ristroph-The New Desert Youngjae Lee-Keeping Desert Honest Matthew Lister-Desert: Empirical, Not Metaphysical Alice Ristroph-Response to Lee and Lister Joseph E. Kennedy-Empirical Desert and the Endpoints of Punishment Andrew E. Taslitz-Empirical Desert: The Yin and Yang of Criminal Justice Adil Ahmad Haque-Legitimacy as Strategy Laura I. Appleman-Sentencing, Empirical Desert, and Restorative Justice Reply: Paul H. Robinson Chapter 3. Defending Preventive Detention Christopher Slobogin Comments: Michael Louis Corrado-Slobogin on Dehumanization Michael Marcus-Don't Abandon Sentencing Reform to Defend Preventive Detention Rinat Kitai-Sangero-The Presumption of Innocence versus Preventive Detention Matt Matravers-Unreliability, Innocence, and Preventive Detention Joseph E. Kennedy-The Dangers of Dangerousness as a Basis of Incarceration Reply: Christopher Slobogin Chapter 4. The Economics of Crime Control Doron Teichman Comments: Russell D. Covey-The Limits of the Economic Model: Becker's Crime and Punishment Alon Harel-The Economic Analysis of Crime Control: A Friendly Critique Keith N. Hylton-Effi cient Deterrence and Crime Control Morris B. Hoffman-Law, Economics, and Neuroethical Realism Reply: Doron Teichman Chapter 5. The Difficulties of Deterrence as a Distributive Principle Paul H. Robinson Comments: Russell D. Covey-Deter...
