Fr. 130.00

Politics of Prisoner Abuse - The United States and Enemy Prisoners After 9/11

English · Hardback

Shipping usually within 1 to 3 weeks (not available at short notice)

Description

Read more

Informationen zum Autor David Forsythe is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. He has been a visiting professor at universities in Geneva and Utrecht and in 2008 he held the Fulbright Distinguished Research Chair of Human Rights and International Studies at the Danish Institute of International Studies, Copenhagen. He has also been on staff for the United Nations University in Tokyo and has been a consultant to both the UN Office of the High Commissioner of Refugees and the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. Klappentext A bold critique of US policies towards terror suspects after 9/11, which will interest all those who value human rights and humanitarian law. Zusammenfassung When states are threatened by war and terrorism! can we really expect them to abide by human rights and humanitarian law? David Forsythe's book is a bold critique of US policies towards terror suspects after 9/11! providing an account which will interest all those who value human rights and humanitarian law. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Prisoner abuse and political morality in historical perspective; 2. Political morality and the Bush Administration; 3. Bush lawyers: the politics of legal interpretation; 4. The military: Afghanistan, Guantánamo, Iraq; 5. The CIA: kidnapping, Black Sites, extraordinary rendition; 6. Due process: detention classification, Military Commissions; 7. Prisoner abuse and the politics of transnational justice.

Customer reviews

No reviews have been written for this item yet. Write the first review and be helpful to other users when they decide on a purchase.

Write a review

Thumbs up or thumbs down? Write your own review.

For messages to CeDe.ch please use the contact form.

The input fields marked * are obligatory

By submitting this form you agree to our data privacy statement.