Read more
Informationen zum Autor Professor Kam C. Wong teaches at the Department of Criminal Justice! Xavier University! Cincinnati! Ohio! where he once was a chairperson. Concurrently! he is a faculty fellow at the School of Criminal Justice! SUNY-Albany! New York. An Inspector of Police with the Hong Kong Police! Dr. Wong was awarded the Commissioner's High Commendation. Currently! he is an Honorary Fellow at the Center for Criminology at Hong Kong University. Professor Wong is a legal consultant to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada on Chinese law issues; an expert consultant to U.K. Beirut Police Integrity Workshop! the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; an expert observer at the United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders; and an expert consultant to HKP and Ministry of Public Security! People's Republic of China. Zusammenfassung Exploring the history and reform of policing in Hong Kong, this book focuses on the colonial years and questions accepted colonial history. Inhaltsverzeichnis COLONIAL POLICING WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICSStudy of Policing in Hong KongIntroductionFocus and OrganisationPolice Study in Hong Kong: A Brief HistoryResearch OutputStudying Policing in Hong Kong: Problems and IssuesConclusionEndnotesDebating Colonial PolicingIntroductionConcept of Colonial PolicingDeconstructing Colonial PolicingA: Colonial Police in Multiple FormsB: Colonial Policing as 'People' PolicingC. Colonial Policing as 'Pluralistic' PolicingD. Colonial Policing as 'Collaborative' PolicingE: Colonial Policing as 'Discretionary' PolicingF: Colonial Policing as 'More or Less' Governmental ControlTrue Nature of Colonial PolicingConclusionEndnotesAssessing Colonial PolicingIntroductionFramework of AnalysisA Cultural Model of AnalysisTheoretical Assessing of the HKP: Colonial Policing and Political LegitimacyIntroductionThe DebateHong Kong People Can Define Legitimacy DifferentlyHong Kong People Can Accept 'Colonial Policing' without LegitimacyCross-Cultural Law EnforcementA Chinese Legitimacy TestEmpirical Assessment: HKP Chinese Officers on HKPIntroductionConfucianism and HKP Free SpeechResearch Data OverviewOn Wisdom of Colonial RuleConcluding ThoughtsConclusionEndnotesPolicing with Hong Kong CharacteristicsIntroductionColonial Policing as Policing ChineseColonial Policing as Chinese PolicingColonial Policing as Self-Help PolicingChinese Theory of Self-HelpDiscussionApplicationColonial Policing as Policing MigrantColonial Policing as Relationship (Guanxi) PolicingJuvenile versus Adult DebateTerrorist versus Criminal ControversyPolicing Relationship: Strangers versus IntimatesRelationship Policing: Rural versus UrbanConclusionEndnotesPOLICE REFORM IN 1950sPolice Reform LiteratureIntroductionPolice ReformTypologies of Police ReformForces of ChangeHow to Conduct Police Reform?Accountable to What! Whom and How?Impact of Police ReformHow to Assess HKP Reform?HKP Reform InquiriesConclusionEndnotesPolicing in Colonial Hong KongIntroductionPolicing with Colonial CharacteristicsHistorical Developments of the HKPColonial Policing: Continuity and ChangeInspector Quincey (1870-1890)CIP Reynolds (1910-1932)Chief Inspector Andrew (1912-1938)Police ReformersConclusionEndnotesFormation of Hong Kong Police in the 1840sIntroductionCrimes in Hong KongCrime Control MeasuresPolicing in Hong KongFormation of Hong Kong Police Force: The Legal FrameworkThe Legal FrameworkThe Police Laws and Role of HKPPolice Leadership and Policing in Hong KongConclusionEndnotesHKP Reform in the 1950s: Context and FrameworkIntroductionResearch DataContexts of ReformDirection of ReformProcess and Measures of ReformDecolonisationLocalisationConclusionEndnotesHKP Reform: The 1950sIntroductionLocalisationLegalisationModernisationSelf-Promotion of HKPCommunalisationOrganisationBureaucratisationHKP VoicesConclusionIntellectual ChallengeAnalytical Framework Proposed: Methodological IndividualismC...
