Read more
In the burgeoning literature on welfare regimes and typologies, this comparative study offers a stimulating new perspective. Kaufmann, the doyen of the sociology of social policy in Germany, emphasizes norms, culture and history, in contrast to political economy approaches. Comparing Britain, Sweden, France and Germany, Kaufmann highlights the "idiosyncrasy" of each welfare state: countries are compared with regard to their state traditions and the relationship between state and civil society; their national "social questions"; their economic systems, including the unions and labour law; social security and redistribution; and their personal social services and education. The socio-cultural approach enables Kaufmann to show that not all modern states are welfare states. Some are just "capitalism" (the USA), others are "socialism" (the former Soviet Union). In this light, the (essentially North-West European) welfare state is portrayed as a third way between capitalism and socialism.
List of contents
L. Leisering: Introduction.- F.-X. Kaufmann: Variations of the Welfare State - Great Britain, France and Germany Between Capitalism and Socialism: Preliminary Methodological Remarks.- Theoretical Foundations.- Welfare State Development Between Capitalism and Socialism.- Variations on the Welfare State Principle in Europe.- And Germany?- Synoptic Concluding Remarks.
About the author
Franz-Xaver Kaufmann, geb. 1932, em. Prof. für Sozialpolitik und Soziologie an der Universität Bielefeld. Von 1979 bis 1983 Direktor am Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Forschung der Universität Bielefeld, von 1980 bis 1992 am von ihm gegründeten Institut für Bevölkerungspolitik. Forschungsschwerpunkte u.a. Religionssoziologie; Mitherausgeber von "Christlicher Glaube in moderner Gesellschaft" (Herder).
Summary
In the burgeoning literature on welfare regimes and typologies, this comparative study offers a stimulating new perspective. Kaufmann, the doyen of the sociology of social policy in Germany, emphasizes norms, culture and history, in contrast to political economy approaches. Comparing Britain, Sweden, France and Germany, Kaufmann highlights the „idiosyncrasy” of each welfare state: countries are compared with regard to their state traditions and the relationship between state and civil society; their national “social questions”; their economic systems, including the unions and labour law; social security and redistribution; and their personal social services and education. The socio-cultural approach enables Kaufmann to show that not all modern states are welfare states. Some are just „capitalism“ (the USA), others are „socialism“ (the former Soviet Union). In this light, the (essentially North-West European) welfare state is portrayed as a third way between capitalism and socialism.
