Ulteriori informazioni
This manuscript argues for the importance of Günter Grass as a political thinker in addition to his status as a novelist and public intellectual, capable of forming ethical responses to contemporary issues like neoliberalism and place of the petit bourgeoisie in social life. I define Grass's trajectory as a thinker through his novels and speeches. Primarily, I draw attention to the role memory plays in Grass's thought: that his work represented an intellectual and aesthetic response to the role Nazism continued to play in West German politics in the post war era. To Grass, Nazism represented a resurgent threat unaddressed following the end of World War II. Later, Grass amended his concept of memory politics to address neoliberal capitalism, reiterating his radicalism and affirming the need for German society to resist the rise of extreme ideologies.
Sommario
Acknowledgements
Chapter 1 - Introduction: Class, Politics, and Memory
Chapter 2 - The Petite Bourgeoisie in the Danzig Trilogy, 1959-1965
Chapter 3 - "A Literary Concept": The Kulturnation in the Divided Germany, 1965-1979
Chapter 4 - "Distant but not Foreign": Memory Politics and the Future of Remembrance, 1980-2006
Chapter 5 - Conclusion: Penelope and Sisyphus
Full Reference List
Index
Info autore
Alex Donovan Cole is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Northeastern State University in Tahlequah, OK, specializing in Politics and Literature, German Political Thought, and Comparative Political Economy. He has undertaken education at Columbus State University, Columbus, GA; Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA; and Regent's Park College, Oxford University, Oxford, England.
Riassunto
I argue for the importance of Günter Grass as a political thinker in addition to his status as a novelist and public intellectual, capable of forming ethical responses to issues like neoliberalism and place of the petit bourgeoisie in politics. I define Grass’s political trajectory through his novels and speeches.
