Scientific Peer Review Guidelines for Informative Peer Review

J. Matthias Starck comprehensively guides the reader in this essential through all steps of writing an expert review for a scientific journal. It is built on a succinct analysis how science works, how science is communicated and how science is published. It provides a critical guide how to write good, informative and fair peer reviews. The author presents a critical discussion of different peer review procedures and their alternatives, explains ethical guidelines as well as the dark sides of scientific publishing. So this essential helps the reader to perform better in the existing system and to contribute to its further development and improvement.

Riassunto

A short analysis of basic principles how science works, how science is communicated, and how it is published  A comprehensive presentation of how to write a review for a scientific journal



A discussion of ethical guidelines applicable in scientific publishing



An analysis and critique of various peer review procedures 

Dettagli sul prodotto

• Autori: J. Matthias Starck, J Matthias Starck
• Editore: Springer, Berlin
• Contenuto: Libro
• Forma del prodotto: Tascabile
• Data pubblicazione: 30.11.2017
• Categoria: Scienze naturali, medicina, informatica, tecnica > Biologia
• EAN: 9783658199142
• ISBN: 978-3-658-19914-2
• Numero di pagine: 59
• Illustrazioni: IX, 59 p.
• Dimensioni (della confezione): 14.7 x 21.6 x 0.5 cm
• Peso (della confezione): 107 g
• Serie: essentials; Essentials
• Categorie: Psychologie, C, Coaching, Science: general issues, popular science, Naturwissenschaften, allgemein, Life Sciences, Management: leadership & motivation, Biomedical and Life Sciences, Teaching of a specific subject, Science Education, Life Sciences, general, Employees—Coaching of, Popular Life Sciences