Ulteriori informazioni
Zusatztext The book is very clearly written and argued, and we get helpful summaries at various points. Thus, the book not only sheds new light on Freges main project, but in addition, it offers some stimulating systematic thoughts regarding the prevailing standard views on logic. Informationen zum Autor Patricia A. Blanchette is Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame Klappentext In Frege's Conception of Logic Patricia A. Blanchette explores the relationship between Gottlob Frege's understanding of conceptual analysis and his understanding of logic. She argues that the fruitfulness of Frege's conception of logic, and the illuminating differences between that conception and those more modern views that have largely supplanted it, are best understood against the backdrop of a clear account of the role of conceptual analysis in logical investigation. The first part of the book locates the role of conceptual analysis in Frege's logicist project. Blanchette argues that despite a number of difficulties, Frege's use of analysis in the service of logicism is a powerful and coherent tool. As a result of coming to grips with his use of that tool, we can see that there is, despite appearances, no conflict between Frege's intention to demonstrate the grounds of ordinary arithmetic and the fact that the numerals of his derived sentences fail to co-refer with ordinary numerals. In the second part of the book, Blanchette explores the resulting conception of logic itself, and some of the straightforward ways in which Frege's conception differs from its now-familiar descendants. In particular, Blanchette argues that consistency, as Frege understands it, differs significantly from the kind of consistency demonstrable via the construction of models. To appreciate this difference is to appreciate the extent to which Frege was right in his debate with Hilbert over consistency- and independence-proofs in geometry. For similar reasons, modern results such as the completeness of formal systems and the categoricity of theories do not have for Frege the same importance they are commonly taken to have by his post-Tarskian descendants. These differences, together with the coherence of Frege's position, provide reason for caution with respect to the appeal to formal systems and their properties in the treatment of fundamental logical properties and relations. Zusammenfassung In Frege's Conception of Logic Patricia A. Blanchette explores the relationship between Gottlob Frege's understanding of conceptual analysis and his understanding of logic. Inhaltsverzeichnis Acknowledgements Introduction Chapter 1 - Logicism and Conceptual Analysis 1.1 Introduction to Analysis and Proof 1.2 Analysis and Proof in 1879 1.2.1 Derivation, Proof and Definition 1.2.2 Conceptual Analysis 1.3 Analysis in 1881 1.4. Analysis in 1884 1.5 Grundgesetze 1.6. The General Picture Chapter 2 - Thoughts 2.1 Thoughts and Language 2.2 Sense and Reference 2.3 The Structure of Sense 2.4 Thoughts and Language Again 2.5 Where we are Chapter 3 - Thoughts and Sharp Boundaries 3.1 The Issue 3.2. The Texts 3.3 Piecemeal Definition and New Objects 3.4 Ordinary Discourse 3.5 Caesar 3.6 Quantification 3.7 Conclusion Chapter 4 - The Analysis of Arithmetic 4.1 - The Issue 4.2 Analysis as Thought-Preserving? 4.3 Reference-Preservation and Analysis 4.4 Dummett on What's Preserved 4.5 What's Preserved 4.5.i The Case of Directions 4.5.ii. Numbers 4.5.iii - Arithmetic 4.5.iv Alternative Reductions 4.6 Conclusions Chapter 5 - Analysis and Consistency: The Case of Geometry 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Frege-Hilbert 5.3 Hilbert's Method 5.4 Frege's Objections 5.5 Consistency and Concepts 5.6 Analysis and Consistency 5.7 The 1906 Passage ...
