En savoir plus
Zusatztext ...I can think of no better collection of incisive and insightful comments on Commonwealth jurisprudence...Civil practitioners will profit from the in-depth study... Informationen zum Autor J R Spencer is Professor Emeritus of Law in the Law Faculty at the University of Cambridge and a Bye-Fellow at Murray Edwards College, Cambridge. Klappentext John Spencer has worked at Cambridge University for over 40 years. He has lectured, supervised - and entertained - students in tort law, contract law, medical law, criminal law, criminal procedure, and evidence. This book is a tribute to Professor Spencer, but it is different from the usual tribute in that it contains case notes written and selected by the author himself and previously published in the Cambridge Law Journal (CLJ) from 1970 and 2013. The selected case notes provide a master-class in the writing of incisive, engaging notes. Written with students in mind, but also intended for a wider audience, these case notes epitomize the way in which Professor Spencer has, for 43 years, cajoled, lambasted, and encouraged the judiciary to see things his way. Zusammenfassung This book is a tribute to Professor Spencer, but it is different from the usual tribute in that it contains case notes written and selected by the author himself and all published in the Cambridge Law Journal between 1970 and 2013. Inhaltsverzeichnis The Rescuer as Defendant – Reversal of Roles Rescuer as Defendant – Reversal of Roles Reversed Widening Scope of Defence of Contributory Negligence Trespassers will be Prosecuted – Wooden Lie Comes True Criminal Trespass – Wooden Lies Reach the House of Lords Belt up! – The Widening Scope of Contributory Negligence Ask for it, Get it, and Sue for it – Provocation and Contributory Negligence Kidnapping – The Crime Backs Down on its Demands Tissue Donors: Are they Rescuers, or Merely Volunteers? Blasphemous Libel Resurrected – Gay News and Grim Tidings Lies, Damned Lies, and Corroboration Dishonesty: What the Jury Thinks the Defendant Thought the Jury Would Have Thought Retrials, Reason and the House of Lords Theft – Appropriation and Consent On Contemplating the Range of Contemplation Precedent and Criminal Cases in the House of Lords A Duty of Common Humanity to Bees Murder in the Dark Murder in the Dark: A Glimmer of Light? Flooding, Fault and Private Nuisance The Evidence of Little Children Citizens Arrest – At their Peril Causal Links and Congenital Disabilities Involuntary Intoxication as a Defence Freedom to Denounce Your Fellow Citizens to the Police Involuntary Intoxication as a Defence Protecting the Mentally Disordered Defendant against Herself Seances, and the Secrecy of the Jury-Room Civil Liability for Making False Accusations to the Police Bugging and Burglary by the Police Electronic Eavesdropping and Anomalies in the Law of Evidence Everybody Out Insanity and Mens Rea Procedural Anomalies Protecting the Mentally Disturbed Defendant against Himself Naming and Shaming Young Offenders Entrapment and the European Convention on Human Rights "Rape Shields" and the Right to a Fair Trial Did the Jury Misbehave? Don't Ask, Because We do not Want to Know Acquitted: Presumed Innocent, or Deemed Lucky to Have Got Away with it? Spouses as Witnesses: Back to Brighton Rock? Civil Liability for Abuse of the Criminal Process: Downstream of Three Rivers Strict Liability and the European Convention Juries: The Freedom to Act Irresponsibly Is that a Gun in Your Pocket? Or Are You Purposively Constructive? Damages for Lost Chances: Lost for Good? Child Witnesses and the European Union Liability for Purely Economic Loss Again: "Small Earthquake in Chile. Not Many Dead"? Drunken Defence The Evidential Status of Previous Inconsistent Statements Acquitting t...
